E - Coating and Powder Coating stripping
applications Stripping e-coat and powder from racks in-plant
Samuel L. Miles,
This article is an overview of the three most common stripping methods used
by finishers to clean hooks, racks, and part rejects. The article points out
the major benefits and concerns of each method with users of
electro-deposition coating (e- coating) and powder coating in mind.
Many methods are available for removing powder coating and e-coating from
production hooks, racks, and fixtures. The most beneficial means available
can be the same for both coating processes. Before you can fully measure the
benefits of chemical stripping (Figure 1), you must first understand the
common practices used to clean racks.
The finishing industry rack cleaning practice has been to use burn-off ovens
or abrasive-media blasting to remove e-coat and powder, either by doing it
in-plant or by sending the racks out to stripping services.
Burn-off ovens
Benefits. The burn-off oven method provides adequate results for coating
removal. The benefit of the burn-off oven is the coating buildup on the rack
can accumulate from 3 mils to more than 50 mils in some cases, and the
burn-off oven continues to provide adequate cleaning results.
Concerns. Burn-off ovens operate at temperatures up to 1,000F for durations
of 1 to 8 hours. These temperatures and cycles over time can cause stress,
brittleness, and metal fatigue on the steel rack substrate. In addition,
residual coating ash is left behind on the rack surface after burning and
must be removed by pressure water rinse or acid chemical pickle to prevent
dirt contamination. The cost of gas (energy) to operate a burn-off oven must
also be absorbed by the end user.
Benefits. Abrasive-media blasting is another common method used in the
finishing industry to clean e-coat and powder coating deposits from racks.
Abrasive-media blasting provides adequate cleaning and coating removal. One
of the benefits of rack cleaning with abrasive media is any rust or
oxidation that may be
present is removed with the coating, and this is accomplished at ambient, or
room,
temperature.
Concerns. Using abrasive media to clean racks on a regular basis results in
loss of metal. This means that over time the racks must be completely
replaced. Another concern associated with this method, is the residual
blasting media, if not completely removed from the racks can create dirt
contamination upon subsequent use. In addition, abrasive media is often
carried out with the racks and distributed on the plant floors, creating
safety concerns. The cost of abrasive- media replacement must be absorbed by
the end user.
Chemical stripping solutions
Benefits. A chemical stripping process can be done in-plant at considerably
less expense than the burn-off and the abrasive-media blasting methods,
which require higher equipment, energy, and media costs than chemical
stripping requires. Chemical stripping operates at moderate temperatures,
usually 150F to 200F, which keeps energy costs down. Chemical stripping
also leaves the original surface of the racks intact and very clean after a
freshwater rinse.
Chemically stripping e-coating from parts is also easy and quick because of
the low film build created during the first pass through the e-coat tank.
First-pass film build is usually about 1 mil. As a result, strip time is
normally 20 to 30 minutes. In less than an hour, the racks are ready to be
returned to the coating line.
E-coated and powder-coated rework parts can also be recycled and restored to
their original surface quality, and reprocessed through the coating lines in
less than an hour. Powder coating racks can also be chemically stripped, as
long as the racks have fewer than 10 mils of powder buildup and are cleaned
daily. Concerns. Common questions concerning chemical stripping for
racks and coating rework involve the proper training and knowledge
associated with environmental and operator handling. The latest chemical
stripping solutions are more environmentally and operator friendly than
those in the past. Powder coating and e- coating sludge must be removed
regularly, either by filtration equipment or by decanting on an as-required
basis. The cost of chemical replenishment must be
absorbed by the end user.
Samuel L. Miles, owner-Miles Chemical Solutions, LLC, Fort Lauderdale, FL
For further information on chemical stripping, visit:
www.mileschemicalsolutions.com